NOT SO POPULAR

ARCHIVE    RSS     THEME   

  • by Nazli Tarzi

    Some call it miniature Damascus; others describe it as Palestine’s cultural Capital, either or; Nablus’s old city predates back to Roman times, some 4,500 years ago, whose existence has been most serviceable regarding the preservation of Palestine’s edifying identity.

    Within Contemporary times, new attention has amounted upon the ancient heart of Nablus, which makes it the reputable hot spot for the wrong people for the worst reasons. Sadly, occupying forces have committed great efforts in undertaking mass destruction and demolition of the Old City, without an absolute or justifiable necessity to do so. The contentious Capital since 2000 and it’s later occupation that occurred in 2003 has endured a rise of profuse suffering, under the incessant War aims and frequent War games administered by Israel’s defense units. The enormity nd severity in result of Israeli actions are visibly prevalent inside the Old city walls; which encapsulate IDFs most favorable tactic, better known to some as attack and destroy to implement their singular objective to obliterate the Palestinian people into infinity and beyond.

    Such volatile provocation has mutilated the organic beauty that has wilted away and left only overarching shadows illuminating the faces of the hundreds killed, cherished beneath the majestically concave architecture, where the city acquires the nickname miniature Damascus. On arrival to the Old city I was equally as alarmed I was to be happy once seeing how the residual damage hauntingly evokes abominable recollection of Palestine agonizing past. As grievous as it is, recognizing the past plays a huge role amidst the Nabulsi society who’re willing to forgive yet unable to forget. The old city layers have shed away through pain, murder and injustice, only giving way to new city layers, thicker, more indecorous yet strong in their new artistically taken form.

    Upon the arrival of Art; Nablus persistently radiates positively as art serves as a tool of resistance against the occupation. The Old cities ancestral character exuberates the past and the continual battle between life and death; exposing Israel’s aspiration to ethnically cleanse Palestine from knowledge of the wider globe. Posters of martyrs and those dead are plastered across arches walls, homes and every possible spot. Their faces are inescapable, with following eyes, predominantly of young children, who’re targeted for a crime perhaps as petty as throwing stones. Tears well into my eyes, swirling, inescapably from side to side, yet tears in Palestine are representative of weakness and on this basis alone I’ll cast out such emotions in imitating the Palestinian resiliency.  The presence of Art has therefore developed into the policing force helping protect the Old cities inhabitants away from psychological meltdown or traumatic breakdown.

    Tragedy has, unsurprisingly, entwined inside the hearts of countless Palestinians whose search for new hope to escape the climate of promenading heartache, by-produced by the occupation remains unforeseeable. It is near impossible to imagine how one can cope under greatly strenuous circumstances under the acknowledgement that a ‘greater’ force is relentlessly surrounding you to advance in their expanding policy of extermination. I certainly struggle to conceive these realities let alone to be living inside of them. Since the eruption of the first Palestinian intifada, Nablus and other cultural Capitals, have been the first cities met by mass destruction that have dismantled treasured infrastructures, ancient architectures, happiness and human laughter. Restoration appears slim as we see how the occupation has reduced life to a mere cat and mouse game, where peoples only purpose is to survive. Here again we learn about the symptoms of Israelis Apartheid that imposes disastrous limitations upon Palestinian territories, making restoration, renovation and preservation only a distant dream that lives large in the reminiscent past, inside the Palestinian imagination.

    Ways, in which lives of ordinary Palestinian are impacted, go beyond municipal and provincial destruction to infrastructure and land however. Further impacts suggest the future to come, remains tragic in form, as the damage has robbed Nablus from the possibility to flourish through tourism attraction. These possibilities, to bluntly state are now paralyzed and little can change this matter of fact. As I walk across the serpentine avenues upon the old city paves, it’s occurs to me that the old cities most frequent visitor has become only the shadow of death, little tourists are aware or find this emancipated cultural hub of any interest, unfortunately. Nablus, once upon a time had been a thriving economical, touristic, industrial, cultural and historical community which are suppressed and left feebly stable. I feel it’d be appropriate to describe the cultural, so intriguing capital, as a virtual muriel whose characters dissipated gradually through the aging of time. Their rejuvenation can never relive the vibrancy these characters had been in the past; nonetheless, what remains most important is to keep their imagination alive in spite of what happens.

    In maintaining their presence one would pray that the World will free it’s mind from the foothold of warped media. The fabrication tells the story of ‘The Land of Israel’ and casts out the land that was once called Palestine before the establishment of Israel in 1948. This fable helps keep the international sphere incalculably ignorant, only to prolong the peace and equality, Palestinians deserve. From my personal perspective, the demolition is infinitely clear and validated by my visit to the Old city, where I visited one of the three Soap factories, in comparison to the 80 soap factories alive, prior to the Israeli bombardment.

    War crimes conducted by the IDF have not only killed humans systematically but have succeeded in paralyzing economic life to a large extent. The combination of missile and foot soldier bombardment, 24-hour curfews, the murder of significant Palestinian affiliated to resistance movements and the purposeful destruction of manufacturing factories have left the Old city, as the Nabulsi municipality estimates, damages in costs that approximate up to 54 million US dollars, between April 2002 up till march 2003. This does not include damages past these dates nor repercussions ongoing despite the heavy period of attacks. The damages continue to resonate and live on, even if in the subconscious of the Palestinian mind.

    By your sincerely a Baghdadi lost in translation 



  • DONNA….

    LADONNA

    Amazing.

  • DONNA….

    LADONNA

    Amazing.

  • [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

    ‘Don’t Believe Ayn Rand’ - Novella

    “She felt suddenly as if nothing existed beyond that circle, and she wondered at the joyous, proud comfort to be found in a sense of the finite, in the knowledge that the field of one’s concern lay within the realm of one’s sight.”
    -Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

    Ayn Rand is best known for developing the philosophy of Objectivism. That as human beings our perception of the world is objective and we exist and are determined by the nature of reality, not by the thoughts we might have. Her novel ‘Atlas Shrugged’ was voted in 1991 the most read, most influential book after the Bible. 

    The core philosophy purported:  “the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute”. Rand encouraged rational self-interest and the ‘virtue’ of selfishness in her philosophy based on reason and egoism.
    The 1950s and 60s saw ‘The Collective’ (an inside ironic joke, acknowledging the groups commitment to individualism) develop and begin to influence big business in America. Adam Curtis explores how far reaching Rand’s influence became in ‘All watched over by machines of loving grace…’ and Novella have a catchy, girl-pop jangle track warning us not to believe everything Rand promoted.  




  • Brooklyn’s Spanish Prisoners are about to release their sophomore album, ‘Gold Fools’ - a psychedelic pop record filled with a unique electronic ambiance. Here they play “Rich Blood” at Bushwick DIY space, the Schoolhouse.”

  • TRAILER TRASH TRACYS NEW SINGLE- LOS ANGERED

    ‘Los Angered – a cosmic fusion of 50s pop refrains and waves of drum machine patterns..’

    A dreamy, drifty debut influenced by girl grounds and David Lynch” – Guardian

    Hypnotic .. an epic debut” – Dazed & Confused

  • The Magnetic Fields-69 Love songs

    “I should have forgotten you long ago but you are in every song I know”

  • SIGN THE PETITION HERE

    Rudi’s Save Our Libraries Campaign

    Ugly rumours are circulating that the magnificent, purpose-built, Women’s Library at London Metropolitan University may have its opening hours and facilities drastically curtailed to perhaps one day a week at the best. Such hours would not be befitting a Library of this stature. It has a staff of unparalled knowledge, expertise, helpfulness and warmth. This Library is one of the most magnificent specialist libraries in the world, having started life as the Fawcett Library in a poky, cramped, dark basement in Calcutta House, in Old Catle Street. With money from the Lottery it has become something that previously women - and men - could only have dreamed of. Women have visited from all over not just Britain, but the world. It is a national asset. Whatever the University’s problems - which we hope will be resolved - under no circumstances should the Women’s Library suffer in any way. Please join, and PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE pass this onto your friends.

    You can find a Group to join on my Facebook page.    

    UPDATE - The Women’s Library is very grateful to Rudi for the work done on this petition, which has already gained tremendous support. We would like to keep all of our supporters updated as the campaign develops, which we will do through our Facebook 
    page

    In March this year, it was announced by the London Metropolitan University Board of Governors that The Women’s Library must find a new home, owner, or sponsor by December 2012, or the library faces having its opening hours cut from five days to one, or being closed all together.




  • I just have to point out how much I loved the final ‘Dancing On My Own’ scene in the latest episode of Girls

    I just have to point out how much I loved the final ‘Dancing On My Own’ scene in the latest episode of Girls

    (Source: thetvscreen, via amyohconnor)

  • Phèdre vid e o for ‘In Decay’

  • I am researching self sabotage instead of working on my Final Major Project.

  • A video I made to Nite Jewel’s ‘Weak For Me’

    And a brilliant video it is!
  • Egyptian women protest against army's use of violence against them in Cairo
    Egyptian women protest against the army’s use of violence against them in Cairo in 2011 after images of women who had been brutally beaten were circulated. Photograph: Mohamed Omar/EPA

    An explosive call for a sexual revolution across the Arab world in which the author argues that Arab men “hate” Arab women has provoked a fierce debate about the subjugation of women in countries such asEgyptMorocco and Saudi Arabia.

    Women are deeply divided over the article, entitled “Why do they hate us?”, by the prominent American-Egyptian journalist Mona Eltahawy, which fulminates against “the pulsating heart of misogyny in the Middle East” and builds to an early crescendo by stating: “We have no freedoms because they hate us … Yes: They hate us. It must be said.”

    Eltahawy is not alone in stressing that a revolution has come and gone, but done little for Arab women. There are only eight women in Egypt’s new 500-seat parliament – and not one female presidential candidate. Domestic violence, forced marriage and female genital mutilation are still part of the status quo across a region covering more than 20 countries and 350 million people.

    “Even after these ‘revolutions,’ all is more or less considered well with the world as long as women are covered up, anchored to the home, denied the simple mobility of getting into their own cars, forced to get permission from men to travel, and unable to marry without a male guardian’s blessing – or divorce either,” Eltahawy argues in Foreign Policy. “An entire political and economic system – one that treats half of humanity like animals – must be destroyed along with the other more obvious tyrannies choking off the region from its future. Until the rage shifts from the oppressors in our presidential palaces to the oppressors on our streets and in our homes, our revolution has not even begun.”

    Eltahawy draws on anecdotal and empirical evidence for her tirade: 90% of women who have ever been married in Egypt “have had their genitals cut in the name of modesty”; not one Arab country is in the top 100 nations as ranked by gender equality; Saudi women have beenprosecuted for daring to drive a car. Eltahawy nails the paradox that it is women who must cover up – because of the sexual impulses of Arab men.

    But plenty of women across the Arab world have taken objection to Eltahawy’s blanket condemnation of men.

    “I agree with most of what she said but I think that the one thing that she might be reluctant to admit is that it’s not about men hating women, it’s about monotheistic religions hating women,” says Joumana Haddad, a Lebanese author and journalist. “They continually reinforce patriarchal standards and patterns that have existed long before. There is no harmony possible between monotheism and women’s rights. The teachings deny women their dignity and rights.”

    Dalia Abd El-Hameed, a researcher on health issues at the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, added: “It is oversimplistic to say Arab men hate Arab women; it presents us as needing to be saved. I don’t want to be saved, because I am not a victim. We can’t put all Egyptian women in one category, let alone Arab women. My problems are not the same as a rural woman from Upper Egypt.”

    Sarah Naguib, a political activist in Egypt, said: “I honestly think it’s almost offensive to be asked if Arab men hate Arab women. That’s like saying all Muslims are terrorists and all Jews are evil and the American dream still lives on.”

    Lina Ben Mhenni, a Tunisian lecturer nominated last year for the Nobel peace prize, said: “It seems to me that this article inaccurately lumps all men together; from a purely personal perspective, if today I’m seen as a blogger who defends the rights of women as well as of other groups, it’s because I have a father who is more feminist than I am myself.”

    Mhenni notes that in Tunisia men and women are working together to defend the freedoms and rights of women. “The examples cited by Mona are real enough, but to speak of hatred as the reason behind discrimination between men and women is exaggerated, uncalled-for even. You have to look at all the historical, social and political factors which are behind all this. Arab regimes have always limited our horizons, undermined our educational systems, and restricted access to culture. It has been a strategy to manipulate the crowd and send it in a certain direction.”

    In Beirut, Haddad points out that just as not all men are culpable, some women are. “Many women support such negative notions of femininity: endorsing the alpha male, reinforcing the patriarchal system, obedience, submission, financial dependence. There are many women who do not believe in women playing a role in business or demanding their political rights. According to much of the religious teachings it’s impossible.”

    Although that may be true, there is no doubt that even Lebanese law militates against women in places. “There is no law that protects women from domestic violence,” notes Lebanese MP Sethrida Geagea. “A husband can violate his wife and even rape her and there is nothing to protect her. Two months ago we passed a draft law that banned so-called honour killings. Before then, if a father or brother thought a woman from his family was seeing another man he could kill her and would spend no more than two months in jail.

    “That has now changed but real change in attitudes will take a lot longer.”

    Others say that women are only one of many oppressed groups. In an article on Comment is Free this week, Nesrine Malik argued: “Yes, in Saudi Arabia women cannot drive, but men cannot elect their government; instead they are ruled over by a religiously opportunistic dynasty. In Egypt, it’s true that women were subjected to virginity tests, but men were sodomised. In Sudan women are lashed for wearing trousers, but ethnic minorities are also marginalised and under assault. We must not belittle the issues women face, or relegate them to second place, but we must place them in a wider context where wholesale reform is needed. One cannot reduce a much more universal and complicated problem merely to gender.”

    Laila Marrakchi, a Moroccan film-maker, takes issue with the word “hate”, arguing that many Arab men are repressed too. “It’s not hatred, it’s fear of women – which in turn brings the hatred. There is so much frustration among men in the Arab world, it begins with sexual frustration, and the frustration of not being able to speak out, and not having political freedom.”

    Tunisia may historically have enjoyed the most liberal attitudes towards women’s rights, but some fear that may be changing, despite last year’s revolution. Saloua Karoui Ounalli, a lecturer in American and English literature at Tunis University, said: “Things have changed in just a few months. I can’t wear miniskirts at work now, on the campus, for fear that someone will attack me. I only wear trousers now. This change in environment began a couple of years back, when the number of women wearing the veil started to increase.”

    She says a sexual revolution is desperately needed. “But right now is not the best timing. First you need a cultural revolution to train people to think with a critical frame of mind, to take into account the plurality of cultures in the world, so that they can see Arab culture as just one among thousands of cultures; it isn’t necessarily the best one and doesn’t necessarily possess the truth. A sexual revolution would be a waste of time until you have first taught people to evaluate their own culture with some detachment from the sacred.”

    Moroccan journalist Nadia Lamlili says the Arab world does not need a sexual revolution so much as a cultural revolution in the way people are brought up and the way the sexes are segregated.

    “It seems to me that the problems facing Arab women derive more from a lack of understanding between the sexes, which is above all due to the two sexes not being allowed to mix, and of the morbid desire on the part of the Arab regimes to keep society divided: men to one side, women to the other,” she says. “By separating the sexes, the Arab regimes want to manage sexual temptation. But it doesn’t take away the temptation. In fact it exasperates and amplifies the temptation, and ends up with violence in dealings between men and women.

    “The problem with our societies is that the women are in love with their sons instead of their husbands, and the men are in love with their mothers instead of with their wives,” she adds. “Men and women don’t understand one another due to the fact that their dealings are not at all clear, as they don’t spend enough time together or don’t engage with each other enough.”



175